_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
NEWS
Dragon Ha-Go New Variant
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 - 12:34 PM UTC
For Japanese armour fans, there is another version of the Type 95 on its way in 1/35 scale from Dragon Models.

Link to Item

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
JPTRR
Staff MemberManaging Editor
RAILROAD MODELING
#051
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: December 21, 2002
KitMaker: 7,772 posts
Armorama: 2,447 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 - 01:18 PM UTC
If the model looks as good in styrene as CAD, it will be a beauty.
shermaholic-king
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: December 30, 2012
KitMaker: 34 posts
Armorama: 33 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 - 02:07 PM UTC
The main difference with this Type 95 and the earlier release is not the machine gun but the upside down suspension arms. This variant was used in Manchuria.
PantherF
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 04, 2013 - 12:07 AM UTC
Now that there is a choice, I must get one!

In 2001 we visited the Army Museum in Hawaii and they had the Ha-Go and an M24 outside which I hear now that they have built a building for them.

This one looks like the version I need to build.



~ Jeff
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 04, 2013 - 12:14 AM UTC

Quoted Text

The main difference with this Type 95 and the earlier release is not the machine gun but the upside down suspension arms. This variant was used in Manchuria.



Hi, All! DRAGON just MAY HAVE used 2 different 3-directional slide-molds to render the machine guns- They are of different lengths in the CAD illustrations. Guess I'll need to buy this version of the HA-GO (Modified).

It's easy to miss, but if we look a little bit closer at the newer kit's bogie/road-wheel assemblies, we'll find that a smaller road-wheel was added in-between the 2 larger road-wheels to provide better cross-country performance. These tanks were tested in Manchuria, but the "improved" 3-wheeled bogie assemblies offered only marginal cross-country performance gains. This design was not developed any further.

The next design in the evolutionary process of the Type 95 HA-GO, took shape in the Type 98-A KE-NI, which ran on 6 smaller-diameter road-wheels grouped in 3 bogies per side. These bogies were sprung internally. Production processes were further improved by more extensive welding in this model. These tanks were well-liked by their crews, but no more than 200 were ever built.

The next Light Tank in this series was the Type 98-B KE-NI. This tank was developed as an alternative to the Type 98-A. This tank featured 4 large-wheeled Christie-type running gear per side, and rear drive (a la T-34) with no upper return rollers. Suspension was by individual bell cranks connected by coil springs. The Type 98-B never went past the experimental stage, as it didn't really improve on the cross-country performance of the Type 95.

That little Type 98-B looks pretty interesting to me with those big road-wheels Think I'll kit-bash/scratch-build one of those, using an old FINEMOLDS HA-GO as a donor-kit that I have in my stash. Comparing DRAGON's Type 95 side by side to the FINEMOLDS kit, I prefer the DRAGON kit as a nicer alternative overall...
 _GOTOTOP