_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
News DEF Model: Goat and Greyhound Wheels
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 - 07:20 AM UTC


Two new wheel sets are not available from DEF Model for your Goat and Greyhound.

Read the Full News Story

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
PantherF
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 - 09:30 AM UTC
Sagged tires are the way to go!

Those that disagree and feel they are under-inflated, well I feel sorry for you!

Get your eyes checked!





Jeff
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 03:53 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Sagged tires are the way to go!

Those that disagree and feel they are under-inflated, well I feel sorry for you!

Get your eyes checked!





Jeff



I MOST HEARTILY AGREE!!! Some aftermarket companies tend to exaggerate their resin tires' "out-of-roundness" by "flattening" the ground-contact surfaces a bit too much, and add a bit too much "bulge" to suggest "weight". In my own experience, I find that DEF MODEL, D-TOYS, and HUSSAR keep this exagerration to a minimum, giving the modeller the most realistic appearance.

I've been to many reenactments and shows, and I've photographed lots of real WWII vehicles, and aircraft, especially those of US manufacture. I find that when military tires are inflated to their proper air pressure specs, they STILL display a tiny bit of "bulge" and noticeable "flattening" at road or ground contact.

Some years ago, when DRAGON first released their 1/35 M3-M16 series US Half Track kits, a great furor was raised by certain modellers over the kits' tires being molded "under-inflated and overly-bulged". These same people maintained that the tires should have been perfectly round, with no bulge whatsoever. Yes, DRAGON DID over-exaggerate this appearance, but at least they were on the right track.

I like to replace ALL the tires on my 1/48 aircraft and my 1/35 AFVs and Softskins- I use DEF MODELS, D-TOYS and HUSSAR for my 1/35 stuff, and ULTRACAST, AIRES, and EDUARD BRASSIN for my 1/48 models. The aftermarket resin tires from TRUE DETAILS are way too under-inflated and bulged for my tastes.

I'm also very much in favor of resin and PE updates and replacement parts. As to the 1/24-1/25 automobile replicas and kits that I build, I wish that resin "weighted" tires were available for them, too. Nothing detracts more from a 1/24 or 1/25 automobile than the "toy-like" appearance of perfectly round tires, especially with the more modern cars that wear radial tires, where the look of under-inflation is especially pronounced.

Before "properly cast" resin tires became available for TAMIYA's 1/35 Dragon Wagon, I used a full set of replacement tires and wheels for the tractor and trailer by TANK WORKSHOP. These were cast with perfectly round tires.

What I did to correct this was to assemble the entire frame, axles, hubs, springs, suspensions, etc of both the tractor and trailer as per instructions, and then I cemented the replacement wheel and tire assemblies to the hubs with super-glue gel, setting the two separate chassis aside to dry properly...

Having checked that the wheels and tires were firmly set and un-moveable, I then taped a sheet of 600 Emery paper down onto a large piece of 1/4" x 18" x 18" plexi-glass, which I have permanently mounted on one of my work tables. I then (CAREFULLY) placed the tractor assembly down onto the Emery paper, applied gentle pressure to the tops of the ten tractor tires with my finger tips and sanded the road/ground contact areas of the tires in a "figure-8" motion to achieve uniformity. The trick is not to sand off too much material from the bottoms of the tires- Just enough to give the impression that there IS weight bearing down on the tires. This I did until I had the desired effect, stopping every few seconds to check my progress. I wasn't too concerned about "bulge", because that should be less noticeable than the "flatness" of the road/ground contact areas, anyway. I repeated this process for the trailer tires.

I've been using this technique since about 1967 on my 1/48 aircraft, with excellent results. I never liked the "flattening and bulging" process by using heat to melt styrene plastic tires- too risky...
PantherF
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 04:00 AM UTC
I was once a Tire Technician and multiple ASE Certified Technician in the 80's and 90's. Tires with a vehicle's load on them WILL show some type of bulge, unlike the kits toy-like performance, sagged tires are the best.

Glad I see that a least one man on here is intelligent!


Oh, and nice report Kevin!






Jeff
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 04:06 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I was once a Tire Technician and multiple ASE Certified Technician in the 80's and 90's. Tires with a vehicle's load on them WILL show some type of bulge, unlike the kits toy-like performance, sagged tires are the best.

Glad I see that a least one man on here is intelligent!


Oh, and nice report Kevin!






Jeff



THANKS! Having been in the automobile business for over 25 years, I got to learn a lot about cars and trucks of all sizes, and I applied that knowledge to my modelling hobbies. Working for JOHN DEERE for about 7 years also helped in that I was exposed to farm tractors and equipment, industrial, construction and logging equipment- dozers, log skidders, backhoes, front-end loaders, excavators, etc. I got to see all that stuff in it's dirtiest, greasiest forms. That means knowing where to look to find out what REAL leaking seals, oil plugs, bearings, final-drive units, etc look like after seeing hard usage. It's not hard- a lot of it is just common sense and observation... Being mechanically-inclined helps a lot, too!
DerGeist
Visit this Community
Ohio, United States
Joined: January 21, 2008
KitMaker: 735 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 04:07 AM UTC
All the after market stuff for the Goat coming out lately is making the kit very appealing to me. On an off topic note, an M47 update set has been listed for future release on DEF's website for some time, does anyone know when this set is coming out?


Erik
srmalloy
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: April 15, 2012
KitMaker: 336 posts
Armorama: 298 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 04:23 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I MOST HEARTILY AGREE!!! Some aftermarket companies tend to exaggerate their resin tires' "out-of-roundness" by "flattening" the ground-contact surfaces a bit too much, and add a bit too much "bulge" to suggest "weight". In my own experience, I find that DEF MODEL, D-TOYS, and HUSSAR keep this exagerration to a minimum, giving the modeller the most realistic appearance.



Heavily-sagged tires can be appropriate for vehicles with inflation control that you're showing in a situation where they'd be dialing the inflation down for better ground contact, but that's a specialized application. Even heavily-loaded vehicles don't show the degree of sag I've seen in some sets with normal inflation pressures.
KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 04:24 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I was once a Tire Technician and multiple ASE Certified Technician in the 80's and 90's. Tires with a vehicle's load on them WILL show some type of bulge, unlike the kits toy-like performance, sagged tires are the best.

Glad I see that a least one man on here is intelligent!

Jeff



By the 1980s and 1990s civilian tires were almost completely radial ply construction. Until the late 1960s very, very few were, bias ply construction being dominant to that point. The two tire types behave very differently. Bias ply tires have little bulging while on radials it is significant. In fact, US Combat-type tires were specifically constructed with extra-heavy sidewalls to give a run flat capability and thus had virtually no detectable bulging. On the other hand, Military Desert tires intentionally had weak sidewalls so that they would bulge when the pressure was reduced to increase ground contact area and reduce ground pressure. All tires will have flat spots though, but again, the size of it depends on the construction.

One should also be wary of restored vehicles as tires made for the collector market often do not follow the same construction practices as the originals. Instead, they give the *appearance* of the originals with an internal construction that gives a lower purchase cost and better fuel economy in the typical highway use.

So, the really "intelligent" man realizes that technology changes to meet design requirements as well as evolving over time, and what is right for 2,200 lb commuter car in 2014 might not be what was used on a 30,000 lb cross-country military truck in 1942.

KL
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 04:34 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I MOST HEARTILY AGREE!!! Some aftermarket companies tend to exaggerate their resin tires' "out-of-roundness" by "flattening" the ground-contact surfaces a bit too much, and add a bit too much "bulge" to suggest "weight". In my own experience, I find that DEF MODEL, D-TOYS, and HUSSAR keep this exagerration to a minimum, giving the modeller the most realistic appearance.



Heavily-sagged tires can be appropriate for vehicles with inflation control that you're showing in a situation where they'd be dialing the inflation down for better ground contact, but that's a specialized application. Even heavily-loaded vehicles don't show the degree of sag I've seen in some sets with normal inflation pressures.



That's true about some of the aftermarket wheel-sets showing in-accurate degrees of sag... I was mainly referring to 1/35 WWII vehicles, but more modern vehicles with inflation control are kind of an open book for the modeller who likes to portray different possibilities...
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 04:59 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I was once a Tire Technician and multiple ASE Certified Technician in the 80's and 90's. Tires with a vehicle's load on them WILL show some type of bulge, unlike the kits toy-like performance, sagged tires are the best.

Glad I see that a least one man on here is intelligent!

Jeff



By the 1980s and 1990s civilian tires were almost completely radial ply construction. Until the late 1960s very, very few were, bias ply construction being dominant to that point. The two tire types behave very differently. Bias ply tires have little bulging while on radials it is significant. In fact, US Combat-type tires were specifically constructed with extra-heavy sidewalls to give a run flat capability and thus had virtually no detectable bulging. On the other hand, Military Desert tires intentionally had weak sidewalls so that they would bulge when the pressure was reduced to increase ground contact area and reduce ground pressure. All tires will have flat spots though, but again, the size of it depends on the construction.

One should also be wary of restored vehicles as tires made for the collector market often do not follow the same construction practices as the originals. Instead, they give the *appearance* of the originals with an internal construction that gives a lower purchase cost and better fuel economy in the typical highway use.

So, the really "intelligent" man realizes that technology changes to meet design requirements as well as evolving over time, and what is right for 2,200 lb commuter car in 2014 might not be what was used on a 30,000 lb cross-country military truck in 1942.

KL



Not to contradict you, but to augment what you're saying, the KEY WORDS here are "VIRTUALLY no detectable bulging". There IS SOME bulging, however small, and SOME flattening at road/ground contact, however closely you want to look. I've seen enough tires in my lifetime, whether they are cheap or expensive "replacement" tires, original equipment, or accurately or in-accurately manufactured tires for restored military vehicles. I'm familiar with military AND civilian "run flat" tires, bias-plys, radials, antique tires such as "VOGUES", you name it, I've seen it, so I think I should know what I'm talking about. No matter how stiff or beefed-up a sidewall is, there STILL has to be some "give" in order for a tire to function properly, especially where the tire tread is in contact with a hard, or a soft environment.

M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 05:05 AM UTC

Quoted Text

All the after market stuff for the Goat coming out lately is making the kit very appealing to me. On an off topic note, an M47 update set has been listed for future release on DEF's website for some time, does anyone know when this set is coming out?


Erik



Am I right in postponing my build of the TESTORS/ITALERI M47 until the new DEF Update set comes out? You watch, I'll buy the update and complete my M47, and THEN, some other plastic kit manufacturer will release an entirely new state-of-the-art M47. It NEVER fails...
PantherF
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 05:31 AM UTC
ALL I'm saying is that the kits plastic/styrene tires or even the vinyl tires shows NO FOOT-PRINT or the vehicle's load! Just a round circle! LOL

Sagged tires, whether historically correct towards the correct tire construction or not are more appropriate then those mentioned above.

It is always left up to the modeler how far he wants to go...

... just like individual liked tracks or the single one piece vinyl tracks.


The Tamiya Goat kit doesn't even have a complete tire! Just look at the profiles on picture number 4: http://armorama.com/news/16559






Jeff
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 08:06 AM UTC

Quoted Text

ALL I'm saying is that the kits plastic/styrene tires or even the vinyl tires shows NO FOOT-PRINT or the vehicle's load! Just a round circle! LOL

Sagged tires, whether historically correct towards the correct tire construction or not are more appropriate then those mentioned above.

It is always left up to the modeler how far he wants to go...

... just like individual liked tracks or the single one piece vinyl tracks.


The Tamiya Goat kit doesn't even have a complete tire! Just look at the profiles on picture number 4: http://armorama.com/news/16559






Jeff



OK, so TIRES-SHMIRES!!! JUST DON'T GET ME GOING ON INDY LINKS OR DRAGON's "DS" LINKS!!! I like both, depending on the application, not to open up another can of worms...

PS- I prefer my PAASCHE and BADGER SINGLE-ACTION AIRBRUSHES OVER ANY DUAL-ACTION BRUSHES, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE... THERE! I'VE SAID IT!!! !!!!!
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 08:15 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I was once a Tire Technician and multiple ASE Certified Technician in the 80's and 90's. Tires with a vehicle's load on them WILL show some type of bulge, unlike the kits toy-like performance, sagged tires are the best.

Glad I see that a least one man on here is intelligent!

Jeff



By the 1980s and 1990s civilian tires were almost completely radial ply construction. Until the late 1960s very, very few were, bias ply construction being dominant to that point. The two tire types behave very differently. Bias ply tires have little bulging while on radials it is significant. In fact, US Combat-type tires were specifically constructed with extra-heavy sidewalls to give a run flat capability and thus had virtually no detectable bulging. On the other hand, Military Desert tires intentionally had weak sidewalls so that they would bulge when the pressure was reduced to increase ground contact area and reduce ground pressure. All tires will have flat spots though, but again, the size of it depends on the construction.

One should also be wary of restored vehicles as tires made for the collector market often do not follow the same construction practices as the originals. Instead, they give the *appearance* of the originals with an internal construction that gives a lower purchase cost and better fuel economy in the typical highway use.

So, the really "intelligent" man realizes that technology changes to meet design requirements as well as evolving over time, and what is right for 2,200 lb commuter car in 2014 might not be what was used on a 30,000 lb cross-country military truck in 1942.

KL



Hey, guys! I remember a time when a driver got 5,000 miles out of a set of tires without any issues was looked at like he had 6 heads!!!
BruceJ8365
Visit this Community
Kansas, United States
Joined: December 25, 2012
KitMaker: 441 posts
Armorama: 441 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 10, 2014 - 11:28 AM UTC
If I had only X amount of money to spend on aftermarket gizmos for the Goat... I think I could get a lot more bang for my buck by spending it on something like a soft top for the cab and trailer... Rather than spending limited resources to get a tire bulge that I could simulate with a little heat and a few techniques.

Is it me, or are some of the aftermarket companies selling solutions to problems that aren't... I've seen lots of PE sets where the kit item is better representation than the PE part - it's like sometimes they make items just because they can ... well correction - I guess they make items because suckers like me are willing to pay for a solution to a problem that doesn't exist!

What the GOAT really needs is:
1. Soft tops for cab and trailer
2. Antennae mount and radio
3. Lifting rings in the front corners of the tractor
4. Correct the mismatch of time eras...
a. The present turn signals are a later version though the engine cover is the first early version.
b. Solution - provide the old fashioned turn signals and/or new version of the engine cover.
5. Provide the winch lever that is so clearly missing
6. Provide side marker lights/clearance lights for the front fenders.
7. Replace the hideous Black Out Drive Light's protective bracket that is supposed to be just stamped sheet metal but in plastic scales to a 2 inch piece of cast armor!


And then of course all the tiny items, but those above are the ones I'd expect should be standard in the kit.

I'm afraid that some of these new kits coming out are based on vehicles that are still around today in enthusiast hands and often are modified or missing things that would have been on the vehicle as seen in the proper era. I think that's what happened with the modern turn signals and old style engine cover.
PantherF
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 - 07:11 AM UTC
I think someone is making a soft top for the Goat but I can't remember if it's cloth or resin?





Jeff
AJLaFleche
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
Armorama: 3,293 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 - 08:15 AM UTC
Legend Resin:

Voyager PE:



C_JACQUEMONT
Visit this Community
Loire-Atlantique, France
Joined: October 09, 2004
KitMaker: 2,433 posts
Armorama: 2,325 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 - 06:59 PM UTC
There is also a couple of sets from Perfect Scale Modellbau, soft top and hard top, although the canvas cover could be better IMVHO.





Is this the later engine cover we're talking about?
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 - 11:53 PM UTC

Quoted Text

If I had only X amount of money to spend on aftermarket gizmos for the Goat... I think I could get a lot more bang for my buck by spending it on something like a soft top for the cab and trailer... Rather than spending limited resources to get a tire bulge that I could simulate with a little heat and a few techniques.

Is it me, or are some of the aftermarket companies selling solutions to problems that aren't... I've seen lots of PE sets where the kit item is better representation than the PE part - it's like sometimes they make items just because they can ... well correction - I guess they make items because suckers like me are willing to pay for a solution to a problem that doesn't exist!

What the GOAT really needs is:
1. Soft tops for cab and trailer
2. Antennae mount and radio
3. Lifting rings in the front corners of the tractor
4. Correct the mismatch of time eras...
a. The present turn signals are a later version though the engine cover is the first early version.
b. Solution - provide the old fashioned turn signals and/or new version of the engine cover.
5. Provide the winch lever that is so clearly missing
6. Provide side marker lights/clearance lights for the front fenders.
7. Replace the hideous Black Out Drive Light's protective bracket that is supposed to be just stamped sheet metal but in plastic scales to a 2 inch piece of cast armor!


And then of course all the tiny items, but those above are the ones I'd expect should be standard in the kit.

I'm afraid that some of these new kits coming out are based on vehicles that are still around today in enthusiast hands and often are modified or missing things that would have been on the vehicle as seen in the proper era. I think that's what happened with the modern turn signals and old style engine cover.



Hi! Not to diss what you said regarding PE and resin updates/upgrades. I really like them, but that's just my opinion. A lot depends on the particular subject at hand. A good example of PE improvements over plastic are the Anti-I.E.D. Slat-Armor kits seen on quite a few AFVs today...

Many times, there are resin and PE parts that are far superior to the parts that you get in the kit. Then again, there are some resin and PE parts that defy all logic- For example, those 1/35 multi-part working PE hinges for WWII German toolboxes;

What're ya gonna do with those things? Play with 'em?

In my own case, once I've completed any kit, it goes behind glass, and there it stays...

In my own experience, I like to check any resin or PE set by reading up on what-all the up-date/back-date and/or upgrade contains before I actually buy it. Wheel/tire upgrades are a must with me, especially when you have a bazillion wheels and tires in a kit like the 1/35 HOBBY BOSS M1070/M1000 Tank Transporter; Spending the extra bucks for a ready-made set of resin "sagged" tires is worth it to me, just in time saved...

Many times, the resin and/or PE upgrades contain details that got missed, omitted, or just plain ignored by the manufacturer in the original kit. Sometimes this is because of budgetary constraints. Many modellers forget, or have absolutely NO IDEA of how much money R&D, engineering, implementation and production really costs before any given product goes on the market. On top of that, there's the new tooling, plus the overhead- wages, utilities, etc, etc...

I really like the 1/48 EDUARD Pre-Painted PE Aircraft Cockpit Upgrades. They sure as hell are an improvement over any scratch-building and painting done free-hand. The same goes for the various 1/35 PE and Film Instrument Clusters, or to go a different route, the ARCHER Instruments are great, too. All this new stuff comes in very handy, especially when you have arthritic hands and old, tired eyes- These things help us older guys immeasurably. Besides, they look GREAT when completed...

I also like resin upgrades because there are things that can be cast in resin that are just not possible in plastic injection molding. Granted, slide-molding has improved the quality and realism in today's plastic injection-molded kits to the nth degree, but STILL, there is room for improvement. PE Brush Guards that protect the lights on various AFVs being just one example among many... Tarps, duffel bags, rucksacks, etc, are especially difficult to replicate in plastic, even with slide-mold technology. Resin heads and figures are rendered with far more life-like features than ANY plastic figures that I've ever seen...

Another glaring example of the need of After-market corrections/upgrades are AFV CLUB's 155mm "Long Tom" and 8" Howitzer kits- You only get POST- World War II Tires and Towing Dollies! To model these kits in WWII configuration, your only recourse is to buy the MASTER MODELS WWII Tires & Wheelsets with or without the Towing Dolly, and your choice of "Military Tires" or "Civilian Tires".

I'm on a limited income now myself, so when I buy a kit that needs "improvements", I'll buy said improvements before I shell out the money for a new kit of a different subject. Most models are put into production with the idea that they'll be on the market for a reasonable amount of time, so I don't worry about "missing out"- There's always eBay, etc to resort to, and a lot of times, you can pick up that model for less money than the original retail price, anyway...

 _GOTOTOP