_GOTOBOTTOM
Figures
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
News
ICM: WWI US infantry
varanusk
Staff MemberManaging Editor
ARMORAMA
Visit this Community
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain / España
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 10, 2016 - 08:50 PM UTC


ICM continues releasing figures of the First World War, now with a set of four US Infantry Soldiers.

Read the Full News Story

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
Charby
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 78 posts
Armorama: 78 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 10, 2016 - 09:03 PM UTC
This looks like a promising and intersting set, but I hope these are development prototypes, cause the gaiters on the enlisted men look... well... like nothing.
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 10, 2016 - 09:10 PM UTC
Carve it yourself alternative puttees. I like the jaunty angles on the helmets. Definitely a close combat, Argonne forest look to them.
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 10, 2016 - 10:36 PM UTC

Quoted Text



ICM continues releasing figures of the First World War, now with a set of four US Infantry Soldiers.

Read the Full News Story

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!



YESSS!!! IT'S ABOUT TIME!!!
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 10, 2016 - 10:37 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Carve it yourself alternative puttees. I like the jaunty angles on the helmets. Definitely a close combat, Argonne forest look to them.



You've got THAT right, Steve! AGREE, MOST EMPHATICALLY!!!
erichvon
Visit this Community
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,694 posts
Armorama: 1,584 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 10, 2016 - 10:45 PM UTC
Now this is more like it! All their other WW1 figures whilst welcome releases were pretty uninspiring and didn't lend themselves to varying poses or doing much with them at all. In fact all of them were in pretty much the same poses whatever army! Hopefully they'll update all the other nations into dynamic combat poses as well.
bilbobee
Visit this Community
Minnesota, United States
Joined: February 28, 2015
KitMaker: 414 posts
Armorama: 406 posts
Posted: Friday, November 11, 2016 - 04:26 AM UTC
Hey Karl, you must of missed the Japan infantry kit by ICM about 3 months ago, with real nice poses like this kit. They must read our comments and started to get smart.
erichvon
Visit this Community
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,694 posts
Armorama: 1,584 posts
Posted: Friday, November 11, 2016 - 07:01 AM UTC
I'll have to have a look for those Phil. Be nice if they are actually listening to us for a change. Maybe the penny's dropped that if they produce kits that we want/suggest they'll sell more rather than something where you glance at the box and don't even pick it up, it looks that uninspiring
jimb
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: August 25, 2006
KitMaker: 2,539 posts
Armorama: 238 posts
Posted: Friday, November 11, 2016 - 08:46 AM UTC
Nice looking figure set. They'll look nice with the Meng FT-17 with the riveted turret. I do agree about the puttees, though.

Jim
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Friday, November 11, 2016 - 09:31 AM UTC
The figures are hardly a finished product. They don't have shoe laces either. They look like rough sculpts that they added some equipment to as a prototype. None of the rifles had the bolt pieces added to them. They are conceptual roughs, not finished products.

We're like looking at the wood frame of a house and complaining that there aren't any walls.
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Friday, November 11, 2016 - 04:59 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The figures are hardly a finished product. They don't have shoe laces either. They look like rough sculpts that they added some equipment to as a prototype. None of the rifles had the bolt pieces added to them. They are conceptual roughs, not finished products.

We're like looking at the wood frame of a house and complaining that there aren't any walls.



AGREE- I can already envision a single Figure vignette in a "Sgt.York"-type of a scenario...
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Friday, November 11, 2016 - 08:28 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The figures are hardly a finished product. They don't have shoe laces either. They look like rough sculpts that they added some equipment to as a prototype. None of the rifles had the bolt pieces added to them. They are conceptual roughs, not finished products.

We're like looking at the wood frame of a house and complaining that there aren't any walls.


You mean ICM intentionally cut incomplete moulds to make equally incomplete models? An expensive proposition! They don't look like CAD representations.
jimb
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: August 25, 2006
KitMaker: 2,539 posts
Armorama: 238 posts
Posted: Friday, November 11, 2016 - 10:47 PM UTC
I know there have been some comments about the puttees (mine included), but didn't enlisted US infantry at this time where canvas gaiters anyway? Or had they changed by 1918?

Jim
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 12, 2016 - 03:10 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

The figures are hardly a finished product. They don't have shoe laces either. They look like rough sculpts that they added some equipment to as a prototype. None of the rifles had the bolt pieces added to them. They are conceptual roughs, not finished products.

We're like looking at the wood frame of a house and complaining that there aren't any walls.


You mean ICM intentionally cut incomplete moulds to make equally incomplete models? An expensive proposition! They don't look like CAD representations.



The figures in the photos may only be "test-shots", but ICM's first set of Doughboys wore the same gaiters/leggings as seen on this new set. Any conjecture or opinions on our part at this point is...

Need I say it? Let's just wait and see what happens...
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 12, 2016 - 05:56 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

The figures are hardly a finished product. They don't have shoe laces either. They look like rough sculpts that they added some equipment to as a prototype. None of the rifles had the bolt pieces added to them. They are conceptual roughs, not finished products.

We're like looking at the wood frame of a house and complaining that there aren't any walls.


You mean ICM intentionally cut incomplete moulds to make equally incomplete models? An expensive proposition! They don't look like CAD representations.



The figures in the photos may only be "test-shots", but ICM's first set of Doughboys wore the same gaiters/leggings as seen on this new set. Any conjecture or opinions on our part at this point is...

Need I say it? Let's just wait and see what happens...



These are the sculpts. Not test shots. There are no join lines and if you look carefully you can see some excess clay from where the plastic parts were jammed on for the pictures.

Since starting to follow figure creation on plasticsoldierreview.com I have gained some familiarity with the medium. I can recognize a sculpt as opposed to a CAD versus a rough mold.

And as a graphic artist I can see a little image manipulation in there too.
Vicious
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 12, 2016 - 06:20 AM UTC

Quoted Text


These are the sculpts. Not test shots. There are no join lines and if you look carefully you can see some excess clay from where the plastic parts were jammed on for the pictures.

Since starting to follow figure creation on plasticsoldierreview.com I have gained some familiarity with the medium. I can recognize a sculpt as opposed to a CAD versus a rough mold.

And as a graphic artist I can see a little image manipulation in there too.



Totaly agree,you can see also the diference in color and texture on the plastic parts add to the sculpt,like hands,helmets,guns and pouches,taked from previus set
Bodeen
#026
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 08, 2002
KitMaker: 1,744 posts
Armorama: 1,359 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 12, 2016 - 09:27 AM UTC
The detail really is a bit soft.
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 12, 2016 - 02:28 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

The figures are hardly a finished product. They don't have shoe laces either. They look like rough sculpts that they added some equipment to as a prototype. None of the rifles had the bolt pieces added to them. They are conceptual roughs, not finished products.

We're like looking at the wood frame of a house and complaining that there aren't any walls.


You mean ICM intentionally cut incomplete moulds to make equally incomplete models? An expensive proposition! They don't look like CAD representations.



The figures in the photos may only be "test-shots", but ICM's first set of Doughboys wore the same gaiters/leggings as seen on this new set. Any conjecture or opinions on our part at this point is...

Need I say it? Let's just wait and see what happens...



These are the sculpts. Not test shots. There are no join lines and if you look carefully you can see some excess clay from where the plastic parts were jammed on for the pictures.

Since starting to follow figure creation on plasticsoldierreview.com I have gained some familiarity with the medium. I can recognize a sculpt as opposed to a CAD versus a rough mold.

And as a graphic artist I can see a little image manipulation in there too.



Hi, Steve!

OK, I'll buy that!

BTW, would you be interested in selling 3 or 4 of your HISTOREX Figures?
dioman13
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: August 19, 2007
KitMaker: 2,184 posts
Armorama: 1,468 posts
Posted: Monday, November 14, 2016 - 10:00 PM UTC
What ever it is, it will be finished soon. And the addition of W.W.1 American troops is very welcome to me. I will definitely be P/U a set or most likely 2 for my dio's.
melende
Joined: February 10, 2007
KitMaker: 47 posts
Armorama: 28 posts
Posted: Friday, December 02, 2016 - 07:55 AM UTC
When are these being released? The poses are great!
melende
Joined: February 10, 2007
KitMaker: 47 posts
Armorama: 28 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 - 05:16 AM UTC
So I just received these today and they are great. The figures in the photos are not as detailed so I do think they are test shots.
 _GOTOTOP