_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
News
Ammo of Mig: Tiger II Ausf B
tatbaqui
Staff MemberNews Writer
ARMORAMA
#040
Visit this Community
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: May 06, 2007
KitMaker: 2,713 posts
Armorama: 2,451 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 05:24 AM UTC


AMMO by Mig Jiménez has announced its new line of plastic kits, starting with its Tiger II Ausf B (Henschel) offered as a 2-in-1 kit.

Read the Full News Story

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
UGBEAR
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: December 01, 2011
KitMaker: 248 posts
Armorama: 247 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 06:08 AM UTC
Finally, a Kingtiger with something different
CowboyfromHell
Visit this Community
Illinois, United States
Joined: September 18, 2014
KitMaker: 69 posts
Armorama: 68 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 11:29 AM UTC
I strongly hope they won't include interior parts and lower the price.
Headhunter506
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 12:33 PM UTC
I wonder if the rear track hangers on the March '45 turret are arranged to only accept non-mirrored links. That is the proper arrangement as shown in Jentz/Doyle's "Germany's Tiger Tanks: VK45.02 to Tiger II". If not, it's not worth consideration. Before anyone says, "Well, you can fix it yourself", you would be correct. Although, for what kits are going or these days, I'd expect it to be correct out of the box.
ChrisK89
Visit this Community
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 02:12 PM UTC
On Ammo of Mig homepage you can find much more infos.. it's not only the changes written in the news here. The "Project" version for example also has the 10,5cm L/68 gun.

http://www.migjimenez.com/en/new-releases/937-king-tiger-2-in-1-panzerkampfwagen-tiger-ausf-b-henschel-turret.html

See for yourselves.
JavierDeLuelmo
Visit this Community
Spain / España
Joined: February 29, 2016
KitMaker: 189 posts
Armorama: 186 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 05:58 PM UTC
Sheinwerfer? Sheinwerfer?
Removed by original poster on 01/21/17 - 13:11:38 (GMT).
ninjrk
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: January 26, 2006
KitMaker: 1,381 posts
Armorama: 1,347 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 06:35 PM UTC
That's funny, as in my stash for 2017 is a Dragon King Tger, a resin May 1945 update set, and the Zitader 10.5 long gun for it! I will buy this one and have two!
Thirian24
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: September 30, 2015
KitMaker: 2,493 posts
Armorama: 2,344 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 08:20 PM UTC
This is awesome. I'll pick one of these up.
acebatau
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 10, 2008
KitMaker: 730 posts
Armorama: 616 posts
Posted: Friday, January 20, 2017 - 09:53 PM UTC
too many KTs, so many choices! I guess it's a good thing...
FJCabeza
Visit this Community
Spain / España
Joined: October 25, 2007
KitMaker: 111 posts
Armorama: 104 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 21, 2017 - 03:16 AM UTC
July 45 turret roof is wrong, no room for rangefinder, they say...
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/e8c8caa84d5b730e0d214e738/images/397af93b-266e-46f9-b050-f55f66f6d857.jpg
Headhunter506
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 21, 2017 - 08:47 AM UTC

Quoted Text



You're right. They must've taken turret height measurements from the drawings on pages 150-151 found in "VK45.02 to Tiger II". The notation at the top of p. 150 states the roof was raised to accommodate the internal rangefinder. But, Mr. Doyle didn't draw the turret with the additional height. It's identical to the March '45 and earlier turrets in that respect.
Taeuss
Visit this Community
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 21, 2017 - 09:21 AM UTC
Interesting times, and so many options, some of which are "what ifs"...will it also come with an interior? I like the idea of the 2 in 1 but only if it reflects facts and not simply gamer speculation. The March '45 interests me the most, though some of the July '45 were already underway and being issued (MG42 vs 34, etc) Either way, I think that I'm currently AWASH with KT kits, so maybe someday...
Panzermeister36
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: May 11, 2016
KitMaker: 14 posts
Armorama: 14 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 22, 2017 - 05:29 AM UTC
This is actually pretty interesting to me. Apparently they'll be shipping out in march. It's cool for sure, if you're into those late-war things that verge on paper panzers (yes I know the March and July '45 versions are real though).
CowboyfromHell
Visit this Community
Illinois, United States
Joined: September 18, 2014
KitMaker: 69 posts
Armorama: 68 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 - 11:28 AM UTC
The original price is 63.50 euro? What are they thinking. Even the reduced price 49.95 Euro is still expensive considering that the kit is exterior only.
jfeenstra
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: April 24, 2014
KitMaker: 342 posts
Armorama: 342 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 - 05:29 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The original price is 63.50 euro? What are they thinking. Even the reduced price 49.95 Euro is still expensive considering that the kit is exterior only.



What kind of price would you expect? 63.50 is only $18 USD more then the original kit. It is a limited edition kit which invariably means that they are probably moulding far less of the new parts which will increase the cost. And limited edition also means that it will generally attract only a specialty crowd that will accept the fact that they will pay more for something like this of a limited nature. And while the price is more then the base Takom kit, it is no more then many other kits from Trumpeter, Dragon, AFV Club, etc.

Doesn't sound unreasonable to me, and if you pre-order it's virtually the same price as the original kit (with no interior included of course).



hugohuertas
Visit this Community
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 02:53 AM UTC

Quoted Text



A glaring mistake, to my eyes....
SDavies
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: January 09, 2010
KitMaker: 979 posts
Armorama: 959 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 26, 2017 - 03:03 AM UTC
I think its an interesting kit but considering is bascially a Tankom King Tiger without the interior it should not be identically priced to the Tankom kit.

I am not really interested in the July 1945 model as it was never actually built
 _GOTOTOP