Reverse Post Order
REPLY
NEW TOPIC
ADD PHOTOS
SUBSCRIBE
_GOTOBOTTOM

 

Armor/AFV
For all military ground-force modelling subjects.
  
Subject: the rationale of scaling down to 1/35
spaarndammerLocation: Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Member Since: January 28, 2007
Posts: 757 entire network, 177 this site
Visit this CommunityLt. Colonel
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 08:46 AM UTC
Hi everybody,

I have a question: what is the rationale of scaling down to 1/35 or 1/72? The scales seem so randomly picked.

Just wondering.



Jelger
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Wojtek Rynkowski
CALLSIGN: Ascaria
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
Member Since: February 01, 2008
Posts: 20 entire network, 5 this site
Visit this CommunityPodporucznik
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 09:04 AM UTC
Hi,

1:72 its old aircraft models scale two yards = one inch... but why 1/35 not 1/36 i dont know... maybe someone know why ??

Regads
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Dean
CALLSIGN: gremlinz
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Member Since: February 07, 2009
Posts: 310 entire network, 292 this site
Visit this CommunityCaptain
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 09:29 AM UTC
I'm pretty sure Tamiya introduced 1/35. No idea why but only thing I can think of was because they used the metric system and the english used the imperial to make 1/32 scale stuff.

Though even then both seem rather arbitrary. 1/36 would have made more sense than 1/32, twice the size of 1/72 and half 1/18 and 1/35 fits nothing.

At a pure guess someone built a scale kit to the size they wanted and it was done backwards. In other words they made the kit first, then measured it and worked out it was 1/35 and that stuck.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Andy Renshaw
CALLSIGN: skyhawk
This user has contributed written articles for Armorama in the past year.Location: Florida, United States
Member Since: June 03, 2003
Posts: 485 entire network, 373 this site
Visit this CommunityStaff Sergeant
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
WWW
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 09:45 AM UTC
mmmm....35 inches equals 89 cm, so that still an odd scale even in metric.

never thought about this before..

maybe it has to do with the width of 2 horses, ruts in roman roads, yada yada
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Fideli Certa Merces -- "to the faithful there is certain reward" 
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Frank Glackin
CALLSIGN: Plasticbattle
Location: Donegal, Ireland
Member Since: May 14, 2002
Posts: 7,170 entire network, 5,293 this site
Visit this Community_AGUARDALT Marszałek Polski
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 09:49 AM UTC
I think it was Military Modelling who did an article on this one time. It was the box size that set the scale one upon a time. The box was standard, so each model had to be scaled to suit this. Tamiya started the 1/35 scale and it caught on, with other companies jumping on the bandwagen of a popular scale.
I think the 1/72 etc were follow on of the railway scales.

Not facts ... just sparks from a rusting memory
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
IPMS Stockholm
plasticbattle@yahoo.com

"The problem with common sense, is that it is not that common"
 
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Scott
CALLSIGN: muchachos
This user has contributed written articles for Armorama in the past year.Location: Ontario, Canada
Member Since: May 21, 2008
Posts: 358 entire network, 295 this site
Visit this CommunityCaptain
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
WWW
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 09:56 AM UTC
I read on Wikipedia it was Tamiya who introduced it because it was the perfect size for batteries, a motor, etc. in a Panther.


Quoted Text

The roots of 1:35 as a military modelling scale lie in early motorized plastic tank kits. To accommodate electric motors and gearboxes, these models needed to be made in a larger scale. There were many companies making such tanks, but it was Tamiya's example that made 1:35 a de facto standard. Early kits in the scale, built around bulky motorization components, often sacrificed scale appearance and detail, but their large size and potential for intricate superdetailing appealed to hobbyists.



SCOTT
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Whatever you do, you'll regret it. 
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Dean
CALLSIGN: gremlinz
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Member Since: February 07, 2009
Posts: 310 entire network, 292 this site
Visit this CommunityCaptain
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 09:58 AM UTC

Quoted Text

mmmm....35 inches equals 89 cm, so that still an odd scale even in metric.



That's the rationalle of a country that uses imperial. It doesn't mean you convert metric into inches or vica versa. It means you don't think in fractions that fit a foot or a yard but rather in decimal units of 10s, 100s etc.

I think with all scales you'd find the origin was something purely arbitrary that made sense at the time.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Alexander
CALLSIGN: Metal_blast
Location: Ontario, Canada
Member Since: January 31, 2008
Posts: 63 entire network, 56 this site
Visit this Community2nd Lieutenant
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 01:44 PM UTC
I always wondered this as well. The first time I ever step foot into a hobby shop... like 6 years ago, and went over to the kits, I was like... why 1/35 scale? It just seemed random to me as well
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
John Jukes
CALLSIGN: jjumbo
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Member Since: August 27, 2006
Posts: 1,737 entire network, 1,684 this site
Visit this CommunityBrigadier
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 02:19 PM UTC
Interesting history, I remember well those days.
Back in the late 1960's, 54mm figures were the standard that got translated into 1/32nd scale for armour.
Airfix started doing 1/32nd figures with their Multi-Pose series and included some vehicles like the M3 Lee and M3 Grant along with a Crusader Mk. III.
IIRC, there were a few Airfix field pieces, 17pdr maybe ???.
Monogram did a range of 1/32nd scale German vehicles such as the Panzer IV Ausf. H, Ostwind, Wirbelwind, StuG IV, Brummbar, Jagdpanzer IV and a range of U.S. vehicles like the M4 Sherman, M4A1 Sherman, M3 Half-Track, M16 GMC, Jeep & 37mm anti-tank gun, Weasel carrier, etc......
Tamiya's really early kits like their M4A3E8 Sherman, M10 and M36 scaled out as a mish-mash somewhere between 1/36th an 1/34th scale and they finally settled on 1/35th for their Military Miniatures series.
Max/Peerless/Tomy were there in the beginning too with 1/35th along with Italieria aka Italeri joining the club.
What's odd is that many of these old kits are still available and haven't been redone !!
Cheers

jjumbo
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Arthur Hamilton Jukes
July 6th, 1922 - June 20th, 2009
Dad, your love will always be with us.

The Canadian Scottish (Princess Mary's)
Motto - "DEAS GU CATH" - Ready for the Fray
March - Blue Bonnets Over The Border
 
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Dean
CALLSIGN: gremlinz
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Member Since: February 07, 2009
Posts: 310 entire network, 292 this site
Visit this CommunityCaptain
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 09:36 PM UTC
I remember Monogram doing some 1/32 scale kits that just never seemed to work as they were the outsider. I often look at the Revell 1/35 Sherman Calliope and wonder if it's just the 1/32 Monogram kit reboxed and relabelled as 1/35 to make it fit in better now.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
ADVERTISEMENTS
jon_a_itsLocation: England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Member Since: April 29, 2004
Posts: 89 entire network, 73 this site
Visit this Community2nd Lieutenant
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 11:23 PM UTC
Fairly sure this is a re-pop of Italeri's M4A3
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
spaarndammerLocation: Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Member Since: January 28, 2007
Posts: 757 entire network, 177 this site
Visit this CommunityLt. Colonel
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 - 11:50 PM UTC
Hi everybody,

thank you for shedding light on this topic. So it is likely that Tamiya had their reasons for doing models in 1/35 and as they turned out most popular, everybody followed them.

Nice to have some insight in how our hobby developed.



Jelger
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
SabotMember Since: December 18, 2001
Posts: 12,061 entire network, 8,662 this site
_AGUARDALT
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 - 01:01 AM UTC
Actually 1/72 scale was first. It translate to 1 inch equaling 6 feet. It started with aircraft recognition models with one inch being the heigth of a 6 foot tall man.

Monogram started 1/35 scale armor before Tamiya did, back in the 1950s. Many of the early Japanese armor kits were copies of Monogram's 1/35 scale kits with motorization added. Tamiya started making their own motorized kits in the current scale used by the other Japanese companies. Because there were size requirements necessary to hold a standard gear box and a pair of batteries, some of the scales are off slightly. Constant scale wasn't much of a concern in the 1960s.

Airfix came out with a nice 1/32 scale line and Monogram followed suite with some of their later armor kits, but by then, the motorized 1/35 scale Japanese tank kits were popular (remember when "Made in Japan" meant a cheap, inexpensive product?) because they were cheap and could roll through the sand box (remember when kids used to play with models they built?). Airfix and Monogram got out of the larger armor models line and the scale was taken over by the Japanese companies.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Geraint Lewis
CALLSIGN: bizzychicken
Location: Wales, United Kingdom
Member Since: September 06, 2008
Posts: 707 entire network, 608 this site
Visit this CommunitySergeant
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 - 04:41 AM UTC
Looking back Airfix 1/32 multi fit figures had real great detail for they're day. They were much better than tamiyas early 1/35 figures with they're stumpy feet and hands. Its a shame that 1/35 took off and 1/32 didn't. Imagine how good the detail would be if you had these modern Resin companies making figures in 1/32. Now that would be amazing.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Current projects Tam Stug IV cut and shunt Trump KV2 Dragon Panther D with zim BefehlsPanther and Tam Hetzer 
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Frank Glackin
CALLSIGN: Plasticbattle
Location: Donegal, Ireland
Member Since: May 14, 2002
Posts: 7,170 entire network, 5,293 this site
Visit this Community_AGUARDALT Marszałek Polski
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 - 09:16 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Looking back Airfix 1/32 multi fit figures had real great detail for they're day.


I couldnīt believe it when I bought a couple of old Airfix 54mm Napoeonic figures .. the detail for the time was amazing. Ive collected about 10 now in total .. mostly mounted figures. They look great.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
IPMS Stockholm
plasticbattle@yahoo.com

"The problem with common sense, is that it is not that common"
 
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Gerald Owens
CALLSIGN: GeraldOwens
Location: Florida, United States
Member Since: March 30, 2006
Posts: 2,021 entire network, 1,991 this site
Visit this CommunityMajor General
PROFILE
PHOTOS
MESSAGE
HIDE USER DETAILS
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
Posted: Thursday, October 15, 2009 - 11:38 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi everybody,

I have a question: what is the rationale of scaling down to 1/35 or 1/72? The scales seem so randomly picked.

Just wondering.



Jelger


Tamiya chose it as a fit the box box scale for their first Panther kit. Independent of that, Monogram chose it as for their military kits in the late 1950's. There were military recognition models made in 1/36th scale that were sold postwar as toys, and the size was familiar. However, a scale ending in 6 makes sense only in countries using the English measurement system, so Monogram chose 1/35th (though they apparently had second thoughts, as some boxings in later years were labeled 1/32nd). Ironically, Monogram zigged just as the rest of the industry zagged. They switched to 1/32nd scale in 1969, just as the new range of Tamiya kits hit the market. Incidentally, in 1/35th scale, a 5'10" man stands exactly two inches tall.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
HIDE SIGNATURE AREAS
Reverse Post Order
REPLY
NEW TOPIC
ADD PHOTOS
SUBSCRIBE
_GOTOTOP
TOP
REPLY
 ACTIONS LATEST POSTS FORUM FAQ ADD PHOTOS

Advertise Here!