_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Dragon Tiger turret fit
PanzerKarl
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 09:00 PM UTC
Wish Dragon went back to the old way of fitting the turret to the hull.I mean the way it used to lock in place when you twist the turret.
Just hate the way it just sits on the hull with the newer kits it's not very secure

Sorry rant over
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 09:55 PM UTC
Probably because with the old way, sometimes it was too tight a fit and the turret jammed (not good when Witmann's faced with a half-dozen Shermans), and modellers complained about that!
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 10:14 PM UTC
Would anyone else like to see this changed?

David
Belt_Fed
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: February 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,325 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 11:01 PM UTC
I usually cut the locking tabs off the hull anyway, so it doesn't really bother me.
russamotto
Visit this Community
Utah, United States
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 11:04 PM UTC
On a kit with no interior I personally like something to hold the turret in place like locking tabs as it keeps the turret from getting knocked off whenever someone (kids, visitor, me) reaches over to touch it. I have forgotten sometimes which kits have it and which don't and I didn't want to fix things in place for that diorama I might build one day. If it had an interior I wanted to show off no locking tabs would better so I could lift it up and out to show off the detail. Just one modelers opinion.
spetsnazgru
Visit this Community
Lebanon
Joined: March 05, 2009
KitMaker: 661 posts
Armorama: 652 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 11:09 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Would anyone else like to see this changed?

David


count me in
BigfootV
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: December 24, 2005
KitMaker: 1,624 posts
Armorama: 994 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 11:13 PM UTC
I did run across this with the M103 build now that you mention it.

However, it wasn't until paint was applied that the turret had challenges moving around. I think Dragon's tolerances do not take into account paint since the turret moved fine during test fit.

Just my two cents.

See ya in the funnies.................
PanzerKarl
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 - 11:56 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Would anyone else like to see this changed?

David



David I think if they made the lip a little longer it might fit more securely.

The lip is a bit too shallow.


Been trying to come up with some idea of making it a bit deeper.
Thanks
Karl
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 05, 2015 - 12:02 AM UTC
That's a model of the real lip, so we can't adjust it without losing accuracy.

David
Tojo72
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 05, 2015 - 12:28 AM UTC
I don't mind it,with the tabs they do get stuck sometimes,once my model goes in the case,no one handles it anyway.
 _GOTOTOP