_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Modern - USA
Modern Armor, AFVs, and Support vehicles.
Hosted by Darren Baker
US Army to Purchase Iron Dome
exgrunt
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: December 17, 2013
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 301 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2019 - 02:30 AM UTC
https://defence-blog.com/army/u-s-army-will-acquire-israels-iron-dome-air-defense-systems.html

Great idea, given the US currently has next to nothing for medium range Air Defense systems. Hopefully they won't stop at only two batteries, this system should be deployed across the entire force.

Also kind makes sense that we would benefit from this, given that the US pretty much paid for it's development.

Nice to see that the Army isn't being a slave to the "not invented here" syndrome. First Trophy, now Iron Dome. USAF might want to take a look at some IDF kit as well....
ReluctantRenegade
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2019 - 04:19 AM UTC
Interesting. The main advantage of this system is (apart from the fact it's already combat proven with a successful interception rate exceeding 90%) that it is able to intercept targets as small as mortar shells threatening a predefined area (based on their trajectory), leaving the ones posing no threat unengaged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4a_ie0J0hU
retiredyank
Visit this Community
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2019 - 06:22 AM UTC
Perhaps this will lead to further collaboration, on tank design. Crew survivability with a punch.
panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2019 - 06:51 AM UTC
We DO pay - a LOT! - for the IDF and its supporting weapons-development industries. Makes a lot of sense that we should at least consider adopting some of their tested-and-proven products for our own use. Israel serves as a sort of "proxy" weapons development-and-testing system that doesn't involve all of the Congressional over-sight, fiscal issues, cost-overruns, politicking and other complications that domestic defense contractors sometimes come along with! And the Israeli testing phase can't be beat for actual "realism" with real in-the-field conditions and contexts with real front-line users. No contrived scenarios, range-limitations, or set-up user circumstances and behaviors for this!

Of course, not every Israeli "successful solution to their sometimes special and unique problems" is likely to be equally useful to us in our oft-times rather different real-world applications... Ideally, we should look closely at ALL of the presumed-vrs-tested conditions and application assumptions involved in every system development and adoption case.

Bob
Trisaw
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Posted: Friday, January 18, 2019 - 03:41 AM UTC
Great decision as not every incoming should be countered with 20mm CIWS.

Iron Dome can also perhaps be loaded into the FMTV Mobile Missile Launcher, and best of all, Iron Dome comes with 20 missiles per launcher and the radar can detect when the incoming is going to hit something or land in a vacant field, thus not wasting missiles to intercept.

Perhaps the US will buy "David's Sling" and "Arrow" too.
ReluctantRenegade
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 - 05:57 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Perhaps the US will buy "David's Sling" and "Arrow" too.



That seems to be the general direction: https://sputniknews.com/military/201802191061798419-israel-us-hetz-test-ministry/
 _GOTOTOP