armorama.com  web 
login   |    register
 _GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
1/35 Panther w/int Rye Field Model
easyco69
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 03:52 AM UTC
Looks kool!
1/35 Panther Ausf.G Early/Late Versions w/Full Interior (Sd.kfz.171) Limited Edition
by Rye Field Model
quote from site-


The model masters at Rye Field are bringing another wonderfully detailed WWII German Armor kit to the masses! This time it is the Sd.Kfz. 171 Panther Ausf. G type! Just like their wonderful Tiger I kit, this Panther kit will come with a full interior as well!

According to the manufacturer this kit can:

Be built as early type or late type Suspension is movable
Optional rubber rim type wheels or 800mm steel type.
Includes marking options to build one of three types.

*Also as an included bonus for the initial release is clear upper body parts so that you can see that wonderful interior detail after the kit has been assembled. Available while supplies last. If your kit does not include these clear parts then it is not part of the initial release. These clear parts replace the solid color parts so there are no solid color upper hull pieces in the initial release.

*Package illustration figures and canvas covers are not included.








Also a 1/35 Sturmtiger w/interior
hanb7323
Visit this Community
Daejeon, Korea / 대한민국
Joined: October 06, 2014
KitMaker: 408 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 04:57 AM UTC
Nice kit!! But weired box art
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 06:46 AM UTC

Quoted Text

like their wonderful Tiger I kit, this Panther kit will come with a full interior as well!


You could fill a 1/35 suitcase with the parts not included in Rye Field's "full interior" Tiger kits. They omitted most of the gear surrounding and connecting the engine. It's stretching the truth to call it "full".
retiredyank
Visit this Community
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 04:37 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

like their wonderful Tiger I kit, this Panther kit will come with a full interior as well!


You could fill a 1/35 suitcase with the parts not included in Rye Field's "full interior" Tiger kits. They omitted most of the gear surrounding and connecting the engine. It's stretching the truth to call it "full".


You knowledge, in this matter is beyond question. However, I doubt we ever see a kit, with "full interior" that doesn't require further detailing. So, let us be happy with what we get and let the super detailers ply their skill.
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 04:57 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

like their wonderful Tiger I kit, this Panther kit will come with a full interior as well!


You could fill a 1/35 suitcase with the parts not included in Rye Field's "full interior" Tiger kits. They omitted most of the gear surrounding and connecting the engine. It's stretching the truth to call it "full".


"1)Holding all that can be contained; 2)Having no empty space: 3)Abundantly supplied or furnished."

Their usage fits the first three meanings of the word "full" according to most, if not all English dictionaries with no stretching.

You're only concerning yourself with "containing the whole matter: perfect" which is not the most frequently cited meaning nor the most common implication of the word.

Semantically the word use is correct and within established norms or English usage. Full can just mean "abundantly supplied with no empty space" without any implication that every little widget is included or any promise of completeness, just that every space has something in it.


So we can rant all we want but they're using the words right and not stretching anything. Even ancient Bandai kits could get away with "full" and all they had was a transmission, a gun breach and an engine.
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 05:54 PM UTC
If the word "full" is so ambiguous, then it's not useful as a description of the kit.

David
TopSmith
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: August 09, 2002
KitMaker: 1,742 posts
Armorama: 1,658 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 07:20 PM UTC
If they said ""the kit has an interior full of parts" then it might not have every piece. That's OK. The common use of full implies you get all the parts. If you don't plan on offering all the parts then just say Your kit comes with an interior and leave it at that.
postbusf
Visit this Community
Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
Joined: November 15, 2007
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 154 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 07:33 PM UTC
Are we really having this discussion!
Talking about sucking all the fun out of the hobby.
This is sad, really sad!

Lets talk about the sentence " What the heck! " and wat it really means.
urumomo
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: August 22, 2013
KitMaker: 675 posts
Armorama: 667 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 07:36 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Are we really having this discussion!


Whole reason I finally subscribed to this thread ... Merry Christmas
hanb7323
Visit this Community
Daejeon, Korea / 대한민국
Joined: October 06, 2014
KitMaker: 408 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 09:16 PM UTC
Latest M.A.N Panther G applied winter camo?. So funny
TopSmith
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: August 09, 2002
KitMaker: 1,742 posts
Armorama: 1,658 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 09:21 PM UTC
No one is really grumping, we are just board and want to see the actual kit. Rye makes a good kit and this one should be interesting to build
Bodeen
#026
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 08, 2002
KitMaker: 1,744 posts
Armorama: 1,359 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 23, 2017 - 10:56 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Are we really having this discussion!
Talking about sucking all the fun out of the hobby.
This is sad, really sad!

Lets talk about the sentence " What the heck! " and wat it really means.


easyco69
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 06:05 AM UTC
it mentions that the muzzle cloth (box art) is not included in the kit....I wonder if there is really clear parts..hence the front angle plate? By the look of the parts picture...the lower hull could be all clear plastic?
ReluctantRenegade
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 01:41 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I wonder if there is really clear parts..hence the front angle plate? By the look of the parts picture...the lower hull could be all clear plastic?


I thinks it’s quiet obvious from the sprue shots, as well as from the boxart (‘Clear Turret & Upper Hull Parts’) that the lower hull (including the real plate) is made out of four (solid) styrene parts, while the upper hull and the whole turret are molded in clear plastic. The front glacis seems to be supplied in both options, probably a hint about RMF’s next Panther in the pipeline (w/o interior).
Removed by original poster on 03/19/18 - 10:35:34 (GMT).
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 05:04 PM UTC
Psst-- my post was tongue in cheek. Word meanings being what they are, they usually are meaningless in advertising copy like this and should never be taken seriously or especially as a statement of absolute truth.

To paraphrase in Alice in wonderland: words can mean whatever I want them to. And they leave holes big enough to drive a Panther tank through which is why legal documents are so tediously long.

And language is fun.

And joyous tidings of the holiday.
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 05:22 PM UTC
Hilbert: clearly you don't like what I posted? If it's against the website rules, please show me the rule and I will apologise.

But be aware that I put many hours of work into researching the Tiger. I do my very best on it and I give you the results for free. I don't think it's fair of you to call my post "thrash".

Now, since you are talking about the tone of Armorama and not saying anything about the RFM Panther, I will refer you to the Site Talk forum.
postbusf
Visit this Community
Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
Joined: November 15, 2007
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 154 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 06:48 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Hilbert: clearly you don't like what I posted? If it's against the website rules, please show me the rule and I will apologise.

But be aware that I put many hours of work into researching the Tiger. I do my very best on it and I give you the results for free. I don't think it's fair of you to call my post "thrash".

Now, since you are talking about the tone of Armorama and not saying anything about the RFM Panther, I will refer you to the Site Talk forum.


I understand Hilbert very well.
David started this topic because he is very pleased with a new up to date Panther G from RFM and wanted to share this with us.
Then the negative posts came by about strange box-art and what the word full really means (OMG).

I don't say that you can not say anything about an new up-comming kit, but keep it constructive.
Untill someone has the actual kit, and details are not what they should be or not at all there, you can constructively post your comments and say what ever you like.

But taking over the topic and wanting to discuss what the word " Full " really means is so not done.

Ps, Sorry David.
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 08:11 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Hilbert: clearly you don't like what I posted? If it's against the website rules, please show me the rule and I will apologise.

But be aware that I put many hours of work into researching the Tiger. I do my very best on it and I give you the results for free. I don't think it's fair of you to call my post "thrash".

Now, since you are talking about the tone of Armorama and not saying anything about the RFM Panther, I will refer you to the Site Talk forum.


I understand Hilbert very well.
David started this topic because he is very pleased with a new up to date Panther G from RFM and wanted to share this with us.
Then the negative posts came by about strange box-art and what the word full really means (OMG).

I don't say that you can not say anything about an new up-comming kit, but keep it constructive.
Untill someone has the actual kit, and details are not what they should be or not at all there, you can constructively post your comments and say what ever you like.

But taking over the topic and wanting to discuss what the word " Full " really means is so not done.

Ps, Sorry David.


So not done? If this was a truly civilized forum for proper intellectual discourse I'd be properly lauded for my clever wit and quick repartee but, alas, we are mired in the oh so correct and humorless present where no one can understand let alone comprehend true wit nor respect those among us who actually have a passing acquaintance with language as opposed to spouting nonsense merely showcasing ignorance and arrogance. Or just not caring.

Honestly, the kit looks like a good solid effort and frankly they used the word full properly and any one who says differently really needs to read a dictionary, a thesaurus and Fowler's English Usage.

Tee-hee. I so love poking you folks. Stop being so stuffy and proper, take a step back and realize words can truly mean anything someone wants them to. We don't have to like it or even like anything. Feel free to bash away. Threading one's wsy through all the bashing, someone somewhere might learn something.
easyco69
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 08:11 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I wonder if there is really clear parts..hence the front angle plate? By the look of the parts picture...the lower hull could be all clear plastic?


I thinks it’s quiet obvious from the sprue shots, as well as from the boxart (‘Clear Turret & Upper Hull Parts’) that the lower hull (including the real plate) is made out of four (solid) styrene parts, while the upper hull and the whole turret are molded in clear plastic. The front glacis seems to be supplied in both options, probably a hint about RMF’s next Panther in the pipeline (w/o interior).


lol dah.....

Yes, I really like this Panther & want to grab it. Everyone is forgiven for being negative.....look at that beautiful Panther! lol
retiredyank
Visit this Community
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 08:52 PM UTC
I will be buying one or two, after I finish accurizing Star's Panther D. Six months, maybe. I like the looks of the interior and doubt most will not clue into the missing bits. A little wiring, here and there. Some magic spray sessions and a ton of weathering. I especially like the clear hull. It reminds me of AFV Club's T-34.
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 09:24 PM UTC
It's a dirty and thankless job, but someone has to be the designated basher!
Removed by original poster on 12/25/17 - 20:38:13 (GMT).
Removed by original poster on 03/19/18 - 10:35:58 (GMT).
Pongo_Arm
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: January 27, 2017
KitMaker: 147 posts
Armorama: 147 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 28, 2017 - 05:17 AM UTC
I think a discussion of what is missing on this kit to be complete is not unreasonable. And only someone who cares and is very knowledgeable would be able to answer that. They may get grumpy in the process but I think the information is worth looking past that and not getting into internet attack dog mode.
 _GOTOTOP